Theories of Language Development


Behaviourist theory of language development - we learn through reinforcement, shaping, and other principles of operant conditioning
  • Infants produce vocalizations (noises)
  • Parents/caregivers reinforce those that resemble language
  • Children imitate patterns that they hear
  • Parents reinforce grammatical phrases, and ignore or punish ungrammatical phrases
  • Pros - simple, fits with what we know about learning theory
  • Cons - many utterances are novel, parents do not actually punish or correct ungrammatical speech

Nativist theories of language development - our brains are specialized to rapidly acquire language just by being exposed to speech. It is an innage, biological capacity
  • Universal grammar - we are born with an innate understanding of the rules of human languages
  • Pros - fits well with data on early language acquisition and sensitive periods
  • Cons - don't explain how language develops, just why

Interactionist theories of language development - infants are born with an innate capacity for language and social interactions are important for language development
  • Parents/caregivers simplify the way they speak to children to mimic stages of language development
  • Newly developed sign languages imitate longer established languages

Tom is explaining how his toddler is learning language to a friend. He says "it's wild how many things she's learning. It's so fast! She's like a little sponge. She really seems to pick up on words and phrases from books we read to her and conversations we have around her. I guess it's time to start watching our language around her!"

Which theory best fits with his statement?